Search

Barnard Park: Council withdraws controversial plan to split up Islington’s last free full-size football pitch

PUBLISHED: 16:00 13 October 2017 | UPDATED: 14:13 16 October 2017

Campaigners from both Barnard Park football pitches and the Sobell Centre outside the Town Hall before a council meeting discussing both controversial projects in May. Picture: Polly Hancock

Campaigners from both Barnard Park football pitches and the Sobell Centre outside the Town Hall before a council meeting discussing both controversial projects in May. Picture: Polly Hancock

Archant

Islington Council’s controversial bid to split up the borough’s last free-to-use full size football pitch has been withdrawn following protests from users and a call-in from the government.

In May, the council submitted an application to split up Barnard Park into a seven-a-side pitch and “green areas”.

It got majority backing at a consultation with neighbours, but some who played football there feared the plans would deprive poor children of a unique resource.

The application passed, to protests on the town hall steps from Highbury Football School and other park users, but in August communities secretary Sajid Javid challenged the decision.

Rather than go through a planning inquiry, the council has agreed to withdraw the plans, but says it will submit a new scheme that includes a 3G nine-a-side pitch in place of the 11-a-side that is there now.

Barnard Park's full-size football pitch. Picture: David Holt/Flickr/CC BY 2.0 Barnard Park's full-size football pitch. Picture: David Holt/Flickr/CC BY 2.0

Islington’s environment boss Cllr Claudia Webbe said today: “Barnard Park is in desperate need of improvement. The secretary of state’s decision to ‘call in’ the plan to improve the park that the council had developed with local residents and park users over many years means the community faces even longer delays before their park is brought up to scratch.

“There have been differing views on this project, but following extensive discussions with the community and park users, we agreed a plan, with majority support, that sought to strike a reasonable balance so Barnard Park could be enjoyed by all including parents, older people, footballers, children and young people and other park users.

“To ensure we can deliver a better Barnard Park without further delays, and to avoid having to spend a large amount of public money on a planning inquiry at a time of continued massive cuts by the government, the council met with Sport England, the Football Foundation and the FA to examine if a compromise could be found.

“We are pleased that, as a result of these discussions, a plan that has the support of Sport England has emerged, which will see Barnard Park get the much needed improvements that local residents and park users want, alongside a new 3G nine-a-side football pitch.

Highbury Football School will be left without a home after Islington Council decided to get rid of the Barnard Park sports pitch. Picture: Polly Hancock Highbury Football School will be left without a home after Islington Council decided to get rid of the Barnard Park sports pitch. Picture: Polly Hancock

“We will also bring forward plans to provide improved park facilities, with a hub building that includes new park toilets.

“This new plan to improve Barnard Park will see this precious green space improved more quickly than continuing with the secretary of state’s public inquiry.

“The revised design will be based on the existing scheme, and we will of course consult residents on the new plan. We are very grateful to all the many local residents who have already given their views and feedback on the future shape of the park.”

The Friends of Barnard Park have posted a public statement on their website that reads: “Although the Friends of Barnard Park supported the application, we are open minded as to what is now proposed and are relieved that there is no longer a possibility of an 11-a-side destination pitch in our community park.

"A plan that has the support of Sport England has emerged, which will see Barnard Park get the much needed improvements that local residents and park users want, alongside a new 3G nine-a-side football pitch"

Cllr Claudia Webbe

Campaigner Margaret Rowe, of the Save Our Pitch group, welcomed the council’s decision to withdraw its application, but criticised the new plans as they still involve downsizing the 11-a-side space.

“It suits the people from Friends of Barnard Park because they’ve got something that moves the playing area away from their lovely big gardens,” she said, “which the people on the Barnsbury Estate don’t have.”

The Friends of Barnard Park, who supported the original application, said on their website: “We are open minded as to what is now proposed and are relieved that there is no longer a possibility of an 11-a-side destination pitch in our community park.”

Ms Rowe added: “The council is now going to have to have another expensive consultation and a new planning application. The whole raison d’etre is to reduce the size of the pitch for the people who are rich. It’s all about nimbyism.

“[The new plan is] a compromise that will suit some, but it doesn’t suit the rugby club or the schools. If they want to do a sports day, halving that pitch doesn’t give them what they want.”

Save Our Pitch includes the Highbury Wolves football school, Islington Police Warthogs RFC and Copenhagen Youth Project.

Related articles

2 comments

  • When is the Highbury Fields barbecue court case against Islington Council coming up? I was thrown out of the Town Hall when I asked Cllr Claudia Webbe, Environment Exec, how she knows that the people having bbqs in Highbury Fields have no space to do it at home.

    Report this comment

    anitacyclist

    Monday, October 16, 2017

  • Claudia Webbe is talking nonsense. This decision wasn't made to save time or money. It was made to save her and her department being made fools of at the Public Enquiry. They were repeatedly warned that their plan to prettify the park to appease those in bordering houses at the expense of sport provision was against all planning guidelines and open to legal challenge but they chose to ignore anything that didn't fit with their plan for gentrification. They are now promising a new consultation. Let's hope it's better run than that first one and that everyone gets a say. This whole sorry episode has cost Islington taxpayers almost £500,000 to date with nothing to show for it. Heads should roll!

    Report this comment

    Steve Oliver

    Saturday, October 14, 2017

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

Latest Islington News Stories

Police have launched an appeal to help trace a missing vulnerable man who was last seen in Islington, headed in the direction of Highgate.

Lee Jay Hatley’s alleged murderer was “jealous” of his long-term friend, a court heard today.

Yesterday, 11:04

A rugby coach sprinted 50 yards down an Islington cycle track to foil a suspected bike thief.

Mon, 13:50

A campaign group has lost its battle to restrict music events in Finsbury Park – but has promised to appeal yet again by taking the case to the Supreme Court.

Mon, 12:27

The bottom of Holloway Road will be closed for three weeks over Christmas while the Highbury Corner bridge is demolished – and Overground services will also be affected.

Mon, 11:39

A Finsbury Park church is holding an open day to fundraise for its flatulent organ.

Mon, 08:14

Police are appealing for the victim of an attempted knifepoint robbery last night in Beresford Road, Highbury, to contact them.

Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up to receive our regular email newsletter

Most read

Show Job Lists

Digital Edition

cover

Enjoy the
Islington Gazette
e-edition today

Subscribe

Education and Training

cover

Read the
Education and Training
e-edition today

Read Now