Search

Readers' Letters

Readers' Letters

Editor’s comment: Can we have our affordable homes now?

PUBLISHED: 15:00 02 May 2018

The Territorial Army site in Parkhurst Road has been the subject of a five-year planning battle. Picture: GOOGLE STREET VIEW

The Territorial Army site in Parkhurst Road has been the subject of a five-year planning battle. Picture: GOOGLE STREET VIEW

Archant

The delapidated old Territorial Army base in Holloway doesn’t look like much.

Not unless you’re the rather specifically named Parkhurst Road Ltd, anyway, in which case it looks like something that is worth paying through the nose for and then spending goodness knows how much money and five years bickering over.

What I find galling isn’t just that PRL tried to weasel out of providing enough affordable housing in a borough that has a waiting list of 18,300 households.

It’s also that this refusal to build affordable housing became seemingly a matter of principle, to the extent PRL was willing to plough five or six figures of legal fees (its own, the council’s and the government’s) into fighting its requirement to do what is manifestly the right thing – that it was happy to pay for a five-year legal wrangle, but not to pay for any affordable homes.

Without going too far into the business of viability assessments, because I am not a planning expert, the developers’ case was broadly that they shouldn’t be expected to provide the 50 per cent affordable homes Islington requires as a starting point – because they’d overpaid for the site in what they themselves described as a “competitive bidding process” in 2013. There was a huge discrepancy between what Islington Council thought the land was worth (£6.75m) and what PRL thought (£11.9m, based on a controversial valuation procedure called benchmarking).

So what happens now? Hopefully, anyone considering taking the land off PRL’s tired hands will bear in mind the likely requirement to, y’know, put affordable homes on it – meaning they’ll only pay what the land is worth, which won’t be enough for PRL to recoup its costs. So is it too much to hope PRL might instead hang onto it and actually go ahead and build something?

Related articles

Latest Islington Stories

Yesterday, 15:42

Police want to speak to this woman over £1,500 worth of damage to a minicab caused by two passengers.

Finsbury Park has been stripped of its Green Flag status after a damning “mystery shopper” report by an environmental charity.

Yesterday, 11:58

It used to be the most polluted primary in Islington – now St John Evangelist is the first school to ban cars at pick-up and drop-off times.

Yesterday, 10:23

Eastenders actor and Celebrity Masterchef winner John Partridge will be switching on the Archway Christmas lights.

Yesterday, 10:00

Arsenal Women’s Jordan Nobbs has been ruled out of the rest of the WSL season and could miss next summer’s World Cup in France after rupturing her anterior cruciate ligament, writes Joshua Bunting.

Mon, 19:13

A 61-year-old man threatened to fetch his gun while arguing with a shopkeeper in King’s Cross Road on Sunday, it is claimed.

Mon, 18:22

A sports academy is offering free sessions to Islington children every Sunday morning at Market Road Football Pitches.

Mon, 17:02

A discount card supporting local independent businesses has expanded into Islington.

Promoted Content

Fostering older teenagers means giving them the skills for life as an adult. Here, a supportive lodgings carer with Islington Council and young adult who has left care share their stories

Newsletter Sign Up

Islington Gazette twice-weekly newsletter
Sign up to receive our regular email newsletter

Our Privacy Policy

Most read

Show Job Lists

Digital Edition

cover

Enjoy the
Islington Gazette
e-edition today

Subscribe

Education and Training

cover

Read the
Education and Training
e-edition today

Read Now