Islington town hall slammed after third data leak in less than a year
Islington Town Hall - Credit: Archant
The personal details of almost 150 residents have been leaked in Islington Council’s third data breach in less than a year.
In the latest gaffe, less serious than the other two, the private email addresses of 140 people were revealed when a council officer sent out an email on Monday afternoon.
The council has now been referred to the Information Commissioner three times in recent months and could face a fine of up to £500,000.
A spokesman said: “Instead of using the ‘bcc’ field, as is our policy, we used the ‘cc’ field, meaning the recipients’ email addresses were visible. No personal information was disclosed.”
In April, the contact details of people who had complained about a gang loitering on the Andover Estate, in Holloway, were sent to the thugs themselves – and some frightened people had to be re-homed.
You may also want to watch:
Then in September personal details of 2,400 residents, including age, gender and sexuality, were placed on a public website by the council.
After the first two errors town hall chiefs promised to train staff more thoroughly to avoid further slip-ups.
Most Read
- 1 Man wanted in connection with Kings Cross sex assault
- 2 'Good Samaritan' chased off random attacker who hit woman
- 3 Thornhill School's 'dream' library opens after parents' 'relentless' fundraising efforts
- 4 Campaigners debate future of Holloway Women's Building with Peabody Trust
- 5 Islington's great beer gardens - reopening today
- 6 Hackney and Islington have some of the loudest neighbours in London
- 7 Drugs and cash seized in multi-force police op
- 8 Bunhill by-election set to go-ahead following Claudia Webbe's resignation
- 9 'Light at the end of the tunnel': Upper Street shoppers excited to end lockdown
- 10 Canonbury landlords defy pandemic to launch new pub
Cllr Terry Stacy, leader of the opposition Lib Dem group, said: “It’s yet another data blunder by the council. We were assured it would never happen again, but surprise surprise it has. This council clearly cannot be trusted with people’s private information.”