Appeal over “hazardous” Archway adverts
A blind group campaigning to get a pair of “hazardous” advertising boards removed has been forced to take its fight to the Planning Inspectorate.
Talking News Islington (TNI), which records audio newspapers for visually impaired and blind people, has been calling for the boards in Holloway Road, Archway, to be taken away for months.
Elizabeth Jones, 83, of Yerbury Road, Holloway, the chairwoman of TNI, said: “I have banged myself on them two or three times.
“When I walk along, the cane goes underneath because they are on a post. You’re not aware there’s an obstacle, so you walk into it.”
Stephanie Smith, manager of Archway market and a volunteer with TNI, said more than 250 people wrote letters asking Islington Council to remove the boards in April.
You may also want to watch:
The council then ruled they should go – but owner Primesight has appealed. Until the planning inspector makes its decision, the adverts will stay in place.
Ms Smith said: “The boards are a hazard. They cause shock and injury to visually impaired people, who are led into them by the layout of the pavement. Using a cane to feel the tree pit on their right, a blind person will be led directly smack into these boards.”
- 1 Islington man charged with murder of shooting victim Taylor Cox
- 2 Doubling of Covid-19 cases in Islington sparks concern
- 3 Rise in London Covid rates, but people aged 25-30 can book vaccine
- 4 Man in hospital with potentially 'life-changing' injuries following stabbing
- 5 Changes made to St Peter's LTN after Packington Estate used as rat run
- 6 The Bridge London Trust chief exec Penny Barratt awarded OBE
- 7 Phone snatcher admits guilt after robberies in Islington, Hackney and Tower Hamlets
- 8 Islington shooting victim named
- 9 Murder investigation launched after teenager is shot in Islington
- 10 Increased police presence in Islington after teenager shot in the head
Cllr Arthur Graves, a Liberal Democrat councillor for Junction ward, said: “Frankly I think they should go. The council should never have allowed them in the first place.”
Primesight declined to comment.