St Mary’s Path estate won’t be demolished... but tenants will be forced out their homes
- Credit: Polly Hancock
Campaigners have won the battle to stop their historic estate off Upper Street being demolished – but many may still be forced out of their homes.
Islington and Shoreditch Housing Association (ISHA) last year drew up five options to rid St Mary’s Path estate of damp – including flattening it completely.
But most of the families, some of whom have lived on the estate since it was built 70 years ago, do not want to leave their homes and say damp is not justification for demolition.
Following a consultation earlier this year campaign group Protect Our Estate Together (Poet) sent a letter to ISHA demanding the right to return to their homes.
But it hasn’t worked.
You may also want to watch:
New plans outlined last month would see nine new flats built as roof extensions, and three and four bed homes converted into two-beds.
ISHA, which has never responded to the Gazette’s requests for comment, stated in their latest information splurge: “Most customers requiring three and four bedroom accommodation may not be able to return to their home or remain on the estate.
- 1 Upper Street flat attack: Man, 58, stabbed in neck and back
- 2 Launch date for Gordon Ramsay's Upper Street burger chain
- 3 Finsbury Park sex assault: Man arrested on suspicion of rape
- 4 Survey: Where are the safest and most unsafe streets where you live?
- 5 Police investigate alleged Finsbury Park rape
- 6 Taylor Cox 'wanted to play pro football until he was stabbed two years ago'
- 7 Hackney and Islington see another rise in Covid-19 cases
- 8 Jeremy Corbyn echoes Iain Duncan Smith's call to review £1.2bn incinerator plans
- 9 Arsenal offers behind scenes tour of Emirates Stadium at Covid jab pop-up
- 10 Hundreds are heirs to an estate and may not even know
“And most customers living in one and two bedroom accommodation who need to move will be able to remain on the estate but they may not be able to return to their specific property.”
Poet also asked for rents to be kept to the current social housing levels, which also won’t be happening as ISHA has said it will charge affordable rents.
“This means that although ISHA seem to have dropped the idea of demolishing the estate, they are very much intent on destroying the existing community that lives here,” Poet said. “Many people may not be allowed to come back, and those who could come back would most likely be priced out due to the new rents. This amounts to social cleansing. We believe this is not acceptable.”
Following the backlash last year, ISHA hired Bailey Garner to conduct a non-intrusive thermal survey of the blocks to see where the damp is. But Poet says the results should be covered by ISHA’s general repair and maintenance policy.
“This is what we pay a rent and service charge for,” they said. “ISHA should really start fulfilling their obligations as a landlord rather than come up with redevelopment plans.”