Editor’s comment: Voluntary tax increase is oddly familiar
PUBLISHED: 15:00 28 March 2018 | UPDATED: 15:25 29 March 2018
I don’t dislike the idea of asking people in expensive homes to contribute extra council tax to a “fairer Islington fund”.
Personally I’d be all for a mandatory hike at the top end, but I don’t think it’s possible to do that without increasing the bill for people in lower-value properties too and, in any case, you need to stage a referendum to put it up more than 5.99 per cent. And there’s little chance of that passing, which means the £400,000 Islington would spend simply asking the question would be wasted.
But if there’s a whiff of familiarity about the policy, that might be because it isn’t a million miles away from something Cllr Caroline Russell proposed 12 months ago – and for which she got pretty much laughed out of the chamber.
What Cllr Russell was suggesting was holding a referendum and trusting that a majority of people in Islington would give it their blessing. While I admire her faith, I don’t think the policy would have got anything like half the electorate’s backing for the simple reason that so many people in Islington are not well-off. That is neither here nor there because Cllr Russell’s motion was defeated.
But if a voluntary council tax increase was a viable option I think it was somewhat disingenuous for Cllr Hull to tell the chamber at large: “This just shows how out of touch the Islington Green Party is. [...] I think a 4.99pc rise is enough. To take the council tax above 4.99pc would mean holding a referendum.”
A year on, not only has it been decided that the maximum council tax hike isn’t enough after all, but a way to increase it further without holding a poll has been found, too. Heaven forbid Islington’s two elected parties should work together. Far better to preach endlessly to the choir, eh?
If you value what this story gives you, please consider supporting the Islington Gazette. Click the link in the orange box above for details.